You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
It is widely believed that children of different levels of intelligence should be taught together, while others think that more intelligent children should be taught separately.
Discuss and present your own opinion. Which one do your support?
You should write at least 250 words.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Model Answer 1:
In the past in many educational institutions children have been taught together based on their age regardless of intellectual ability displayed at schools. Alternatively, a large proportion of the population believes there should be a strong move towards the separation of children of different intellectual capabilities in current educational institutions. From my own educational perspective, I honestly believe that younger students possessing higher intelligence levels than their peers ought to be separated into alternative levels based on their gift, for a number of reasons.
Admittedly, although young learners have the chance to learn a lot from associating with classmates their own age, it is widely believed that such a process isn’t considered to be vital for a healthy educational upbringing. The argument for intellectual separation holds some strong advantages. Firstly, by allocating students to classes based on levels of intelligence, high achievers have the opportunity to excel in a way that they couldn’t in a normal class. Owing to the fact that they can be placed into an unrestricted educational environment, students can excel with intellectual freedom.
Secondly, there is a strong argument in regards to inhibiting a child’s intellectual growth by restricting them from moving above their peers if their mental capability permits. Why should we limit the intelligence of our future generation? For instance, many of today’s highly successful artists and entrepreneurs in the world have come from an unrestricted educational background and have been allowed to explore their mind and careers to the fullest extent.
In conclusion, although I believe an educational environment for young learners should promote equal opportunity, I honestly think that creating a more liberal environment which enhances the learning capabilities of intellectually-gifted children will not only benefit individual’s careers but future society as a whole.
(This model answer has been prepared by the site developer. However, please note that this is just one example out of many possible answers.)
Model Answer 2:
Separating students by their level of intelligent is suggested by some experts. Yet, taking this idea into practice is still a controversial issue. Some people claim that it is much more justified for genius pupils, whilst other perspective rejects this suggestion and persists on the idea of unseparated schools. Personally, I do believe that all pupils should be taught in the same group.
It is thought that separating children by the factor of intelligence could have better consequences. If the students being segregated, teachers have more capability to teach subjects in higher levels and this wouldn`t make classes monotonous for good students. In particular, mathematic classes could be an interesting class which is broadening the horizons of intelligent pupils in the case of separation.
Although in one view separating student is an advisable project, others, on the hand, believe that not only is this idea broadcasting the hopeless among regular students, but also it refers the share of nurture in education. What makes a pupil a prosperous student is a stimulating environment in school and it is possible by some education of both genius and ordinary children. In the other words, if the students do not being separated, the feel of competitiveness will definitely help their promotion.
To conclude, all the above-mentioned points are in my own perspective rarely do segregation of children influence on positive ways if the whole students are taken into account.
(This model answer was submitted by Mehrdad Mohammadi)